#31
|
||||
|
||||
but buddhists don't believe in god either... this is blatant discrimination... :(
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It's more structured and spiritual than regular atheism. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm not sure what this has to do with anything, but I don't think excluding atheist viewpoints from this discussion is valid. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
oh it's overmind, finally somebody with some semblance of sense arrives...
2/10, had me going for a moment |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
That's a debate out of the reach of the scope of this thread.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
...or make a new topic that discusses why or why not athiesm is a religion?
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Why are there even two apocalypse threads?
What's the purpose of this one? Apocalypse-with-a-religious-twist? Which makes the other one ... what? A discussion of the 'atheist apocalypse'? Does anyone else not see what's wrong with this situation? |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But that works too, I guess. I'd advocate just locking this one and being done with it. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
it's not your place to dictate which opinions are conducive to the discussion at hand and which are not, and you certainly aren't vested with the power to arbitrarily exclude an entire set of people from a thread knock it the fuck off Quote:
again, not her place to demand such a thing but here we are... |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
I don't feel that the "apocalypse" has enough scope to warrant multiple threads. But, whatever.
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
thankfully none of this really matters, in the grand scheme of things...
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Because when its the end of the world, nothing really matters. As an aside, I don't know about you guys but I will be focusing on more pressing matters. Atoning for my sins? Pfffft. I'll likely be trying to work out a deal with God, while simultaneously trying to work out a deal with Satan. If one falls through, I've got to fall back on something, right? |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
So instead of making peace between yourself and the spiritual world, you would rather gamble your way into the afterlife? [ I may not have used the words I was looking for ]
Interesting. |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Yes. It means that we're using the brain that He gave us. |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
It does, but the person can't have a relationship with God if the person doesn't say, "I'm sorry." That's really the whole point of forgiveness, even though God is willing to forgive when the person doesn't apologize.
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
The apology isn't about God. It's about man, who is imperfect.
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Why don't you go ask a minister, SR?
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Atheists are more than welcome to show their view if the world were to turn on itself and suddenly be destroyed, even if they don't believe in God.
@SR, more like Lucifer was the prideful one, believing he was better than God and all the Angels put together. |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Pride is a sin. Lucifer had a superiority complex.
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Eh, I have a superiority complex.
Maybe I'd be better off with Satan since we have so much in common. |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
He is the creator of all things.
SR, really, you should go talk to a minister or something. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
*ALERT*
Thread is veering off-topic. *ALERT* |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Is the god of origins. However somethings had become derived from those which were good.
And the bible speaks in an unliteral way. Ways of which can never be fuly understood. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
God is the ultimate Omniscient being.
It knows all, sees all, and is present in all things. God doesn't make mistakes, but It doesn't want to command and rule a bunch of mindless slaves and robots, which is why Humans and all other living creatures were given free will to decide for them selves. |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
*sigh* Looks like I have to clear things up about my religion rather than provide some mindfucks for the Christians...
It indeed does; we do not hold a sentient divine being in regard. The only divine processes are as natural as time. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, but they are not divine. Besides, that's more of a follower of Shinto grafting Buddhism onto their already felt beliefs. (I do things the other way around, so I'm more Buddhist than Shinto, but the mix is still there.) |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
shinto's pretty cool, why does nobody believe in the interesting religions anymore...
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Regarding Angels.
An extremely, powerful, shining, force that could knock you on your ass as easily as look at you, appears before you, are you going to ask questions or immediately, start bowing and worshipping the creature that could kill you, instantly? (The being is an Angel not God, but you don't have this info before hand.) If this situation were to happen to me, I'd be kneeling bowing, whatever, as long as the creature didn't hurt me. Last edited by GcarOatmealRaisinCookies; 01-17-2010 at 12:16 AM. |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
1. Literally 2. Allegorically 3. Morally 4. Anagogically So... yes it is literal to an extent. The other 3 senses draw from the literal perspective. |
|
|