#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Wouldn't the joke be better with married couples not having sex? A divorced married couple is an oxymoron. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Incorrect. I have seen relationships work without sex...though it is mostly friends that just happen to be married. I'm talking about bad sex. It can lead not only to the worst frustrations you will ever know in your life (compounding any other external stress you might have.) If a couple isn't sexually compatible and force themselves to be monogamous it will lead to self-loathing, emotional abuse, stress, and repression.
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
The right time for sex is when you have found a parnter to whom you trust completely. [ sry for bad grammer ]
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I honestly think in societies where it is variable, free life isn't a bad thing, but I can understand the romantic intent some people have in holding onto the idea of waiting for your perfect partner; I just think once reality sets in that mr/mrs perfect doesn't exist sets in, you feel bit disgruntled at wasted chances and you simply won't be as good at sex as would have been if got bit of experience before found someone actually care about but I digress. The thing is, I though I don't think this best way to handle sex in my opinion, I do believe I cannot call it openly wrong, because if the relationship isn't able to work physically, least know before gets really messy; with marry involved, well marry is shitie enough, this just making it torture and as Gcar said, it isn't a marry, it is a devoice case. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Wasted chances? Hah! That implies I've had any chances! Hahahahahahaha you so funny. Although I do see where you're coming from.
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
What...you agree with you me?...How dare you...by being reasonable, you completely remove my ability to be unreasonable back in a mocking and abrasive manner, thereby removing my supercilious fun...I will have revenge by disagreeing with your agreement. :D
PS In all seriousness thanks...this is a rare day on the YGO-TS site o0 So in reward here is some advice, it doesn't matter if you are the most boring and ugly tai-tai on the planet; you can still have any girl you want (all without the aid of beer...yay beer) just learn to have the confidence to talk a girl like she is human and remember to just say some smart things stupidly and some stupid things smartly. ;) =Or can use the trusty douche wing-man, better by comparison technical attacl, works well too. XD |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
My barracks are full of off shore duty pregnant girls who don't even know who their baby's daddy is, and that's so sad. They'll end up getting out of the military with a kid they didn't want attached to their hip because for whatever reason, having a baby was better than staying attached to a ship.
And after watching these train wreaks for a few days, I still believe sex can wait. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Some of you are sex crazed people that think sex makes a marriage work, and many other things. Don't worry though, i love sexy perverts.
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
So yeah, can we leave examples out of this and just present our own views? |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
People are too casual about their sexuality nowadays. This wasn't going on in years past. It doesn't help that the military can't really stop girls from having kids out of wedlock, because they still have to support the children as dependents and the girls get shore duty until they've had a year with their baby, but still. Years before, at least the girl would have known who the father was because she wouldn't be opening her legs out for /anyone/. That's the problem. You have that, and all the STDS running rampid. Sex doesn't sound that appealing when you're wondering if the guy you like has herpes or not. Last edited by AllisonWalker; 11-13-2011 at 06:37 PM. |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
You think people are casual about their sexuality in America? Try Canada and Britain.
And apparently you are part of a large minority within a small majority. Last edited by gwtyler1985; 11-13-2011 at 07:05 PM. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
It's all equally as bad.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
No. Apparently, Americans are prudes.
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
This can be said to just about anyone in the world, this has absolutely nothing with America, or its being "prude" in your opinion.
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Actually, I'm just judging by more nudity and drug references in some of their basic cable shows that don't make it over here. Fared, are you on to make a reference?
Last edited by gwtyler1985; 11-13-2011 at 07:34 PM. |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Tyler is right; Europeans laugh at Americans and their...outdated ideals, in the UK 16 is the average age to lose virginity. <then again, something tells me clumsy cake is far from interested in reality>
Allison, because some people are stupid, the rest of us, cannot have fun? |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Hm. I would guess that the average age for the US isn’t that far off. From what I can find on the internet it seems to be about 17 for girls, though it depends on gender, religion, culture, etc.
I think I’m going to go ahead and throw in my two cents here, if it’s alright with everyone. After reading through the rest of this thread, I’ve actually held just about every opinion that’s been stated from “don’t do anything until you’re married” to “anything goes”. I grew up in a pretty conservative christian household where my parents when I was younger must have felt just awkward talking about anything sexual with me. But that’s where the internet comes in, right? I guess at this point, I think one should be past their teens (so as to make good decisions in their partners and hopefully have gotten most of their sexual confusion out of the way (after all, sexuality gets even more confusing for a lot of people when they don’t fit into the societal norm ala LGBTQIA)). But...I definitely see the need for particular personalities/particular people to have sex or to be sexually intimate before they’re married. Kind of a “try before you buy” type of deal. I guess what it really comes down to in my opinion though is it depends on the couple involved. Or perhaps on the couples/persons involved if they’re polyamorous. What those people are comfortable with, how strong their libidos are, what their partner’s are comfortable with, what their current situations are in life, how well they’re living in their current situations in life, etc. And when determining the best time to have sex or to be sexually intimate when considering so many variables the only thing that really works is EXTREMELY good communication between all parties involved. Which is the biggest part of any good relationship anyway. ^_^ |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And with that I'm done with the thread. :V |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Lets go back on topic please, unless you want to keep proving me right. Be afraid Fared i got handcuffs and and whip. Sex should be on the back burner until you are ready for it, i'm sick of girls ending up dead or pregnant because they go on their hormones instead of their brains, guy's that say sex should be lost early just want to have sex and might not give a fuck Sex is sex to them i have met a couple of guy's that think the same. Girls and maybe even guys when they get out of their teens will have some regrets when looking back from losing it to Jack/Sally. You don't need to make it your mission to have sex because age 20, that's stupid. But i'm not saying to save it for marriage unless you really want to, save yourself for a person you want to share that special moment with. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I had a roommate once who was polyamorous, however. And...angendered, I suppose, would be the right term. I don’t think I could be polyamorous myself. I’d get too jealous. Quote:
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Nothing against the Jews, but I blame them for the very nature of sexual insecurities.
"Lust is a sin!" Yeah, right. Just kidding though. IT'S EVERY MAJOR RELIGION. It's just that in America, Christianity, and thus Judaism by association, is particularly notable... and America's kinda filled with sexual tightasses. And while you'd think that'd be a good thing, there isn't enough jelly in the whole world to loosen America's tight ass. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
That sounds so hott ^
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
I can understand where it comes from, which is where people get a lot of their excuses for being tight assed. However, when you just force that onto someone when you really have no say in it, then you may as well have used one of the n words because you will no longer have respect from people who don't have their heads up their asses. Or the other side of your debate.
If you're not involved, shut up, and if you are involved, voice your concerns for that person in to that person a way that lets them know you care about them and support them. Yes, this was targeted at the stupid christians who give people like me a bad name. Also, thank you polycumulus. Your input is very appreciated. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
-Tyler=fair comment and I understand your frustration at being type cast.
-poly=lol and this I agree with...but ironically, this is very reason we have any debate at all lol. Quote:
-PS yup, I agree the British are defined by their media and the American media which obviously therefore defines all Americans has never had agenda's or interests in affairs outside its' own country...hmmm, it is actually sad if that is true and ironic if isn't. >> |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
True, but. I'm still awesome Fared, looks like you ordered a session of whipping. I wont disappoint you.
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
How can cake hold a whip? Furthermore, how can a particularly clumsy cake manage to whip correctly even if it DOES manage to hold it?
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
in A set of Americans, E A{x} where x is an American that has or had agendas and/or interests in affairs outside of his/her home country. Premise negated. |
|
|