Quote:
Originally Posted by biggles1
I'll put it simply, I don't really think we should be putting chemicals into our bodies like that UNLESS
There is CLEAR proven medical benefits and usage in it. Weed has lots of supporters for this, but there hasn't ever been a large scale, conclusive medical survey. As such, ALL evidence for it's benefits must be taken dubiously until then.
OR the drugs pose no danger to people unless taken in hugely excessive quantities (i.e alcohol, caffeine ect.) as they are enjoyable and are proven to have virtually no side effects (or at least dangerous ones) when used sensibly.
Long story short, if it's not proven useful and essential or proven virtually harmless, we shouldn't be using it.
Same argument I have with people who say climate change isn't man made. Sure, it MIGHT be a completely natural phenomenon, but you can't claim all those gases and pollutants are doing any good either.
|
Granted not all drugs have fully conclusive evidence to support them, but I am going to look at a drug aside from weed which I would argue is even less harmful and yet is class A, MDMA. If taken sensibly, the effects it has are only short term, with the physical effects mostly being minor pain from body exhaustion, and stablise within a couple of days.
Also, I would say, while I wouldnt take either the drugs myself, weed is generally less harmful than alcohol, particularly in social scenarios. Likewise, alcohol hardly has little to no side effects. You do not have to being drink every night but regular consumption does have long term effects on your liver and such.
And we also have to look at psychology and economics. Getting hold of the drugs are expensive for dealers, so they mix it in with other compounds to bolster it. At a festival over two-thirds of ectacy pills were not actually what they claimed to be but were instead a combination of painkillers and other lesser drugs to have the same effect.
Likewise, since it is a law which bans people from doing something they percieve as pleasurable, they are more likely to do it because of the nature of rebellion against something suppressing their interests. This mixed with the dangers of dealing makes it logical to ban the less dangerous drugs, allowing more focus on law inforcement on the more harmful ones such as Heroin Cocaine and Meth.
Furthermore, expanding the drug sector to legal markets allows for expanded industries and higher taxes for government, allowing for them to spend more into other areas instead of spending on areas which do not necessarilly benefit the people. Just like with alcohol and cigarettes however, for the legalised drugs there needs to be PSAs about the dangers of overdosing, and regulations to prevent people purchasing too many of the drug.